"bitter-sweet"
A
Thesis
Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the
Louisiana State University
and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment
of the requirements
for the degree of Master of Fine Arts in The
School of Art
by
Benjamin D. Rinehart
B.F.A.,
Herron School of Art, Indiana University,
1994
May 1998
Acknowledgements
List
of slides
Abstract
Bitter-Sweet
Slides
Works
Cited
Vita |
.......................................................................
.......................................................................
.......................................................................
.......................................................................
.......................................................................
.......................................................................
....................................................................... |
ii
iv
v
1
11
13
14 |
(top)
The
people of both the gay and straight community
have strongly influenced and served as
an inspiration for this work. I could
not have been able to fulfill my dreams
if it were not for my parents, James and
Patricia Rinehart, my sisters Aimee and
Melissa, and my friends Michael Pullen
and Donya Allison. They have all
expressed their unconditional support toward
myself and my work throughout the years. My
work is dedicated to all who have had to
suffer or struggle with discrimination.
(top)
1.
Dorothy’s Closet |
installation/keychains |
10’x3’x8’ |
1998 |
| 2.
Trash |
installation/letters |
8’x8’x8’ |
1998 |
| 3.
Tricks Are For Trolls |
installation/cards |
10’x4’x8’ |
1998 |
| 4.
Potty-Mouth |
installation/hand
mirrors |
10’x3’x8’ |
1998 |
| 5.
Light in the Loafers |
installation/magnets |
11’x3’x8’ |
1998 |
| 6.
Gay-Dar |
installation/pillows |
8’x8’x3’ |
1998 |
(top)
The
work represented has been derived from
my experiences with family, friends, and
lovers as a gay male. The primary
focus of this six part installation is
to encourage interaction between the viewer
and the images.
(top)
There
is no confection here. My work addresses
homosexuality straight-forward, but not
without overwhelming sarcasm and biting
sense of humor. My work became more
direct in response to the questions of
others, gay and straight,
addressing misconceptions about queer culture. The
work is entirely autobiographical and includes
identifiable images of friends, family,
and self, and draws upon personal letters
and memorabilia. Discrimination and
alienation of homosexuals by
mainstream society are issues that I use
as springboards for image development. My
work, be it installation or individual
pieces, is intended to incite dialogue
and evoke psychological responses from
the viewer. As a queer male,
my relationships and my interest in the
sense of touch are catalysts for my art. The
focus of relationships, touch, and discrimination
have continued to influence both my personal
and artistic development.
Some
of my work manipulates the stereotypes
of the sissy in order
to mock the ridiculous nature of mainstream
myths about homosexuality. For
instance, I use bad “fag” jokes
in my work to draw attention to society’s
ignorance of gay culture. I
use stereotypes, labels, and misconceptions
that are commonly addressed toward homosexuals. The
unenlightened viewer is then able to relate
to the work through the familiarity of
these words and phrases, thus eliminating
any confusion. I see myself first
as a human being without any labels, however,
labels serve as a means of identification
and association. I am working from
the idea that when people are confronted
with stereotypes or labels it may urge
them to question their own morals. I
appreciate differences in people, and try
through my work to stress individuality. In
this way, I intend to bridge the gap between
people of all cultures, stressing their
unique visual and human qualities.
All
of the objects are part of a larger installation
idea. I chose to display my work
in segments of familiar home environments
in order to stimulate visual, intellectual,
and emotional dialogue. Each grouping
of images exists in a room which directly
relates to its function and meaning (pillows
to bed, cards to table). They all
work collectively, however, each object
requires individual attention. There
are aesthetic differences and references
to gay life in each image,
which work together to form the contextual
environment of each room. Each grouping
exists in a simplified monochromatic or
dichromatic living area which unifies and
exemplifies the groupings of images.
Rather
than making and focusing on two-dimensional
images, I have created objects to be held
and environments to be explored. I
intentionally avoided a traditional framed
presentation in favor of an installation
format in order to encourage viewer participation. Touch
and investigation are an essential part
of this interactive environment. My
pieces are presented in familiar contexts
which invite visual intimacy and interaction. Unfortunately
we are raised in a society where touching
is not always considered appropriate, especially
not in a museum or gallery setting. Some
people, like myself, are left with the
insatiable urge to touch or be touched. “All
animals respond to being touched, stroked,
poked in some way, and, in any case, life
itself could not have evolved at all without
touch. . . In the absence of touching and
being touched, people of all ages can sicken
and grow touch-starved” (Ackerman
78-79). The sense of touch permeates
the overall image/installation and by removing
work from the wall I am forcing a temporary
relationship between the viewer and the
art.
The
tactile nature of my work reflects my belief
in the importance of touch as a basic human
need. I have addressed this importance
by creating objects that the viewer is
physically able to access. When the
viewer touches my work, they in turn share
my experiences. Therefore, touchable
forms such as pillows are used throughout
the installation. The pillows are
soft and seductive so that the participant
is drawn to hold them close. As an
example, some of the pockets in the pillows
are illusive so that one must penetrate
deeply in order to find their contents. The
excitement is in the discovery and exploration
of each image/object.
Yes. If
touch didn’t feel good, there’d
be no species, parenthood, or survival. A
mother wouldn’t touch her
baby in the right way unless the
mother felt pleasure doing it. If
we didn’t like the feel of
touching and patting one another,
we wouldn’t have had sex. Those
animals who did more touching instinctively
produced offspring which survived,
and their genes were passed on
and the tendency to touch became
even stronger. We forget
that touch is not only basic to
our species, but the key to it. (Ackerman
77-78) |
All
of the images in the show are two-sided
and meant to be handled in some way. The
objects (cards, key chains, and magnets)
are oversized to stress the satire of each
image and their tactile surfaces.
In
the dining area there are cards displayed
on a kitchen table. The cards, which
are titled Tricks Are For Trolls,
are symbols of game playing and socialization. The
title comes from a standard that is understood
within gay society. When
a queer male gets older
he may be deemed a “Troll”. Trolls
are seen as vultures who seek out young
men for sex. A troll usually expresses
his affection in a very direct way, staring
at his object of desire as if he has been
stripped of his clothing. You
just hope that you’re not the person
he envisions while masturbating.
You
have a great fondness for the lithe
body of a simple young man of around
twenty, a body like that of a lion
cub, don’t you? How
many such young men didn’t
you mentally strip of their clothes
yesterday? Your imagination
is like one of those kits used
for collecting plant specimens. Into
it you gather the naked bodies
of all these ephebes seen during
the day, and then when you’re
home and in bed you select from
your collection the ritual sacrifice
for your pagan ceremony, singling
out one who has caught your particular
fancy. (Mishima 133) |
The
oversized cards I have created for this
piece relay a self-deprecating sense of
humor and also express ambivalence that
often accompanies seeking a mate in the gay world. They
depict a significant duality in that they
express emotional aspects of desperate
men while at the same time representing
theatrical personas (drag queens). The
images of sex toys and phallic shapes on
the cards refer to promiscuity, which most
straight people associate with fags. This
notion of promiscuity is fostered by the
fact that there are still very few viable
outlets for meeting people other than bars,
bath houses, and bathroom stalls. The
backs of the cards carry personal advertisements
in conjunction with comical icons (wedding
ring, sucker, butt plug). While
personal ads can be outlets for meeting
like-minded individuals, they have gained
a reputation as representing sex starved
people seeking available partners. Although
the cards can be seen as Tarot or playing
cards, they are actually more akin to the
underground trading cards of social miscasts
such as the Garbage Pail Kids. These
cards are also intended to be icons, symbolic
of loneliness and personal isolation.
The
bedroom piece titled Gay-Dar is
the focal point of the exhibition. It
epitomizes human sexuality, and more directly
references the sexual nature of queers. I
am challenging the viewer’s sense
of tolerance by forcing him or her to see
a double bed and to envision two people
of the same gender engaging in sexual intercourse. The
pillows embody the ideas of pornography
and promiscuity. The fronts of the pillows
display images of myself either in costume
or drag. The backs of the pillows
have pornographic images of men ready to
engage in some sort of sexual activity. The
duality of the pillows is explored by their
contents. Zippered pockets on the
backs of the pillows contain paraphernalia
(sex toys, drugs, and gay porn) which serve
as tools which may aid sexual and personal
satisfaction (masturbating). The
focus of the pillows is about the thrill
of sex and not about making love. The
idea of commitment and monogamy are not
always factors in homosexual society. Monogamy
is a rarity more than a rule, so it is
not the issue of the bedroom scenario. The
lack of clear detail in the pornographic
images suggests the anonymity shared by
people that engage in promiscuous sexual
activity. Drugs and alcohol seem
to serve as anesthetics used in dealing
with the pressures of being queer. These
substances numb the guilt of promiscuous
behavior and game playing.
With
the use of the bed, I encourage the viewer
to think about sexuality, diseases, and
sexual roles which are important aspects
of gay society. Sexually
transmitted diseases have affected most
communities, and this is why I have chosen
to use condoms (actual & drawn) in
many of the scenes. Living in a community
where HIV is more evident, the game of
Russian Roulette frequently comes to my
mind. Emotional game playing is an
underlying theme in the bedroom scene,
and is a common among many fags. The
game board on the table and carpeting intensifies
the playful and dangerous nature of being
promiscuous. In my experience, being
in a committed relationship does not always
ensure that each partner is monogamous. Instead,
issues of trust consume any sense of security. This
reinforces the sense of isolation or inadequacy
towards forming any sort of long lasting
monogamous relationship.
My
work encourages people to raise questions
about their own securities and insecurities
within society. Associated with sex
is vanity. It plays a very important
role in the gay community
and, hence, it is a very strong theme in
my work. I have used hand mirrors
as the most direct symbol of vain self-identity. Images
of myself and my family have been overlaid
on the reflective mirrored surfaces so
as to impede the viewers’ images
of themselves. The viewer is also
faced with words and bitchy comments from gay men. Moreover,
the mirrors reflect the amount of preparation
that some people go through before going
out on the town. In queer culture,
mirrors also serve as a way of indirect
communication in public settings. A
reflective surface provides the perfect
opportunity to assess someone’s physical
traits without their knowledge. This
is a favorite cat and mouse game played
by many fags.
Light
in the Loafers is the title of the
kitchen scene. This demeaning phrase
is something that I heard as a child
from my family. In this scenario,
I have used familiar icons of magnets
attached to a refrigerator and oven door. The
magnets’ imagery comments on social
and political agendas regarding acceptable
behavior in mainstream society. My
resource and inspiration for the magnets
comes from statements made by the Christian
Coalition and what a tabloid magazine
had written: “Homosexual Cats
Can Be Cured!” My
agenda here is to unmask the lunacies
that are published in the media in order
to provoke questioning and reflection
on the part of the viewer. One
of the myths is that a gay male
might ingest two tons of fecal matter
in his lifetime (heard from a right wing
religious group). Although common
sense dictates that this would be nearly
impossible, people continue to believe
ridiculous untruths about cultures they
are not familiar with because these statements
are published as facts.
All
of the images that exist in each environment
are two-sided. I have always tried
to see both sides of the coin when I formulate
ideas for an image. A duality exists
in utilizing a sense of sarcasm while trying
not to preach. Instead of telling
the viewer what to believe, I propose questions
for each individual to consider. The
two-sided nature of all the images is in
direct relation to the title of the show, bitter-sweet. The title
is also reiterated by the beauty of each
image juxtaposed with a seedy aspect of queer culture. I
also use color in the scenes to seduce
the viewer into eerie yet playful surroundings. Color
intensifies the attractive and pungent
quality of each image, and sets the emotional
tone. I also see bright, opaque color
as the “thick skin” that people
get from being persecuted. This “thick
skin” is a bitter-sweet quality that
suggests strength while also conveying
a sense of freedom.
My
intention is not to stand on a bully-pulpit
and preach about the downfalls of being a
sissy, but rather to encourage
people to reflect on our differences and
to raise questions about our own misgivings
and insecurities both inside and outside
of mainstream society. I am interested
in the sense of alienation and inversely
in the strength it has given homosexuals. It
empowers not only individuals, but the
entire gay culture. The
images that exist within each environment
parallel individuals standing together
to form a collective voice. These
areas foster a nurturing haven for personal
expression without prejudice, in which
individuality can become an asset and not
a liability.
Whether
I am dealing with the idea of relationships,
discrimination, or the sense of touch,
my work strives for an environment of understanding
that both affirms and challenges our own
moral and ethical values. Being a sissy has
proven to be a very positive aspect in
my life. And in doing my work, I
am now able to clearly convey my sexual
identity. It has taken me many years
to reach a level of comfort in expressing
myself as an artist, a human being, and
a queer male. However,
it has given me a courageous sense of pride
which will continue to be a central theme
in my art.
-
Benjamin D. Rinehart
Copyright©1998
(top)
Ackerman,
Diane. A Natural History
of the Senses. New York:
Random House, 1990.
Baldwin,
James. Giovanni’s
Room. New York: Dell
Publishing, 1956.
Chasing
Aimee. Dir. Kevin
Smith. Starring Jason Lee,
Ben Afleck, and Joey Lawrence
Adams. Independent
Film, 1997.
Jeffery. Dir.
Christopher Ashley. Starring
Patrick Stewart, Michael T. Weiss,
and Steven Weber. 1995.
Lie
Down With Dogs. Dir.
Wally White. Starring Wally
White. Independent Film,
1995.
Lippard,
Lucy R. “Out of the
Safety Zone” Art
in America Dec. 1990:
131-139, 182,186
Mishima,
Yukio. Confessions Of
A Mask. England: Acorn
Litho Feltham Middlesex, 1945.
Priscilla
Queen of the Desert. Dir.
Stephan Elliott. Polygram
Video, 1994.
Tailman,
Susan “Love and Death” Arts
Magazine Dec. 1991:
13-14 |
For
questions or to purchase the artwork,
please contact me via email.
h
o m e | a
r t | v
i t a e | t
e a c h | b
o o k | x
t r a s | c
o n t a c t
Created
and designed by Benjamin D. Rinehart
/ SnarkArt Copyright©2000-2008
|